Back to blog
1 min readBy ACWI

Rail Demurrage Transparency Required by New STB Rules

Volume 2, Issue 8 - April 30th, 2014 Following four years of deliberation, the Surface Transportation issued a final rule declaring the railroads cannot assess demurrage charges on warehouse-based third-party logistics providers unless those charges are…

Volume 2, Issue 8 - April 30th, 2014

Following four years of deliberation, the Surface Transportation issued a final rule declaring the railroads cannot assess demurrage charges on warehouse-based third-party logistics providers unless those charges are clearly laid out in tariffs communicated directly to the 3PL.

Commercial warehouses had been fighting the railroads’ practice of charging for demurrage absent a 3PL’s contractual consent.

The STB rule, which will go into effect on July 15, requires railroads to clearly communicate its terms for detention and demurrage charges to the 3PL prior to the placement of the equipment. The bill of lading by itself is no longer recognized as being sufficient to establish demurrage liability.

If the railroad makes material changes to its tariff, a new notice must be sent to the receivers in order for demurrage penalties to be enforced.

The new rule also states that notice of demurrage charges by only including them in a tariff is considered inadequate to assign demurrage liability. Notice of demurrage terms must be contained in an actual notice that is communicated in written or electronic form.

In order to meet their new legal obligation, railroads can send directly to receivers a blanket, one-time notice that includes a link to the full tariff containing the demurrage provisions.

Under STB rules, receivers and warehousemen may file complaints at the board if they believe that the demurrage charges resulting from constructive placement or any other railroad practice is an unreasonable practice.

The new rule states that “demurrage liability does not begin until actual placement or proper notice of constructive placement.” However, in handing down its newest rule the board declined to explain what it believes would constitute “proper notice of constructive placement.”

Originally published April 30, 2014 · updated March 24, 2023.

Related reading

Browse all posts →
4 min

ACWI Spotlight: June 2026

WELCOME JUNE! Chris Kane will be attending the Summer Fancy Food Show in New York City at the end of June. We are excited to share two outstanding resumes with the Xchange Board, welcome Jose Larenas as Strategy & Operations Lead, and cover manufacturing renaissance, IWLA's 3PL impact study, cargo theft recovery, and more…

7 min

ACWI Spotlight: May 2026

HELLO MAY! Dear Members, We welcome May with a lot of global uncertainty — the tariffs that were imposed are now in the process of refunding, oil prices are at record highs, and the four-year transportation recession seems to be behind us. Manufacturing is coming back to America, Mexico just passed China as the #1 exporter to the U.S., and our team is positioning members to take advantage of both shifts…

5 min

ACWI Spotlight: April 2026

WELCOME SPRING! Dear Members, I know many of our members are welcoming Spring after a long hard winter. As you are reading this, I am attending the IWLA Conference in San Antonio, Texas. The IWLA is actually 20 years older than us and is the oldest Warehouse…