Back to blog
1 min readBy ACWI

NLRB Seeks Input About Unionizing College Football

Volume 2, Issue 10 - May 31st, 2014 The National Labor Relations Board has invited public input on whether college football players should be allowed to form a union. The only catch: You need to be a labor lawyer to comment. On March 26 an NLRB regional…

Volume 2, Issue 10 - May 31st, 2014

The National Labor Relations Board has invited public input on whether college football players should be allowed to form a union. The only catch: You need to be a labor lawyer to comment.

On March 26 an NLRB regional director held that Northwestern University players receiving grants-in-aid are employees and thus can form a bargaining unit. (ACWI Advance, 4-15-14, P. 2)

As a result, an election was held on April 25 where the employees cast ballots on whether to join a union. However, the ballots were immediately seized and the NLRB has postponed counting them until the full board can decide on the
issue.

The board is seeking friend-of-the-court briefs from parties other than the university to address a range of issues. Those briefs are due June 26.

In particular, the board requested briefing on the application of a 2004 decision in which it found that Brown University graduate student teaching assistants were not employees under the National Labor Relations Act and thus could not engage in collective bargaining.

Attorney Christine Holst of the law firm of Barnes & Thornburg LLP said the inclusion of this question may signal the NLRB’s potential willingness to overrule the decision.

However, other legal observers believe the regional director wouldn’t have acted in the first place without the go-ahead from the general counsel, who must have known the views of the board majority.

The board also sought input on the relevance of the players’ status under other federal and state laws, such as Title VII and Title IX.

Holst believes this suggests that the NLRB may be amenable to an argument that because scholarship football players are not considered employees under other federal laws, they should not be considered employees under the NLRA. We shall see.

Originally published May 31, 2014 · updated March 24, 2023.

Related reading

Browse all posts →
4 min

ACWI Spotlight: June 2026

WELCOME JUNE! Chris Kane will be attending the Summer Fancy Food Show in New York City at the end of June. We are excited to share two outstanding resumes with the Xchange Board, welcome Jose Larenas as Strategy & Operations Lead, and cover manufacturing renaissance, IWLA's 3PL impact study, cargo theft recovery, and more…

7 min

ACWI Spotlight: May 2026

HELLO MAY! Dear Members, We welcome May with a lot of global uncertainty — the tariffs that were imposed are now in the process of refunding, oil prices are at record highs, and the four-year transportation recession seems to be behind us. Manufacturing is coming back to America, Mexico just passed China as the #1 exporter to the U.S., and our team is positioning members to take advantage of both shifts…

5 min

ACWI Spotlight: April 2026

WELCOME SPRING! Dear Members, I know many of our members are welcoming Spring after a long hard winter. As you are reading this, I am attending the IWLA Conference in San Antonio, Texas. The IWLA is actually 20 years older than us and is the oldest Warehouse…