Back to blog
1 min readBy ACWI

Disabled Law May Cover Transgender

A federal judge in Pennsylvania has ruled for the first time that the Americans With Disabilities Act covers transgender employees. While transgender status by itself is not considered a condition protected by the ADA, the judge held that employees are…

A federal judge in Pennsylvania has ruled for the first time that the Americans With Disabilities Act covers transgender employees.

While transgender status by itself is not considered a condition protected by the ADA, the judge held that employees are covered if they suffer from what is called “gender dysphoria.”

Recognized as an actual psychological ailment, gender dysphoria is defined as “clinically significant distress” experienced by some people whose gender identity does not match their sex assigned at birth.

The suit was brought by a transgender female against her former employer, Cabela’s sporting goods store, alleging that it discriminated against her and failed to accommodate her gender dysphoria by requiring her to use the bathroom corresponding to her birth sex, which was male.

She also said Cabela’s refused to provide her with a female name tag and a female uniform, subjected her to a “pattern of antagonism,” and then fired her in violation of the ADA.

The ADA explicitly excludes “transvestism, transsexualism, pedophilia, exhibitionism, voyeurism, gender identity disorders not resulting from physical impairments, or other sexual behavior disorders; compulsive gambling, kleptomania, or pyromania; or psychoactive substance use disorders resulting from current illegal use of drugs.”

However, the judge found that gender dysphoria causes “clinically significant stress and other impairments that may be disabling,” which can be separated from the law’s exclusions.

“Employers should be aware that at least one federal court says that gender dysphoria is an ADA protected disability that may require reasonable accommodation,” says Robin Shea, partner with the law firm of Constangy Brooks Smith & Prophete.

“It will be interesting to see whether any other courts follow, or whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit will agree,” she adds.

Originally published June 16, 2017 · updated March 22, 2023.

Related reading

Browse all posts →
4 min

ACWI Spotlight: June 2026

WELCOME JUNE! Chris Kane will be attending the Summer Fancy Food Show in New York City at the end of June. We are excited to share two outstanding resumes with the Xchange Board, welcome Jose Larenas as Strategy & Operations Lead, and cover manufacturing renaissance, IWLA's 3PL impact study, cargo theft recovery, and more…

7 min

ACWI Spotlight: May 2026

HELLO MAY! Dear Members, We welcome May with a lot of global uncertainty — the tariffs that were imposed are now in the process of refunding, oil prices are at record highs, and the four-year transportation recession seems to be behind us. Manufacturing is coming back to America, Mexico just passed China as the #1 exporter to the U.S., and our team is positioning members to take advantage of both shifts…

5 min

ACWI Spotlight: April 2026

WELCOME SPRING! Dear Members, I know many of our members are welcoming Spring after a long hard winter. As you are reading this, I am attending the IWLA Conference in San Antonio, Texas. The IWLA is actually 20 years older than us and is the oldest Warehouse…